The Prealpin Railway by Claudio Vianini
Introduction
The great railway plans started and financed in these times regarding the high speed lines (in particular Turin-Lione) and the transformations and rebuildings of the tunnels of Gottardo and of Lötschberg, they make turning down definitively a plan to an alternative path, forgotten for a long time, for the direct connection between Turin and the Sempione, known in the past like prealpine railroad. Nevertheless, as we will see, it has strongly conditioned the development of the railway net in Piemonte, particularly in Novara's area and still today it would have still a sense, at least partially.
History
The plans for the construction of a railway system in Piemonte are initially
drawn in parallel with the consolidation of the Reign of Sardinia, and of the
Reign of Italy then. The first commercial itinerary involved Genova with its
port and the possibility to connect it to the inside. Initially the idea is to
reach the Po or the Lombardy. At the same time the port of Marseilles is
developing quickly, with the already operating railroads for Switzerland and the
Germany. There is also the competition of Venice very soon connected by rail to
Milan. Then the intentions became wider, assuming connections to the lakes and
beyond the Alps, in order to reach Switzerland and the markets of central
Europe.

Under the reign of Carl Alberto in 1837 was constituted the first Commission
with the task to examine the various proposals. A direct line for Alessandria,
Novara and the Lombardy would be the more effective connection, but it would cut
Turin outside, therefore the solution is of a line for Alessandria, from which
would have been builted two branches for Turin and Novara and Lago Maggiore.
Nearly twenty years after the takeover of the Commission, between 1854 and 1856,
the lines Genova-Alessandria-Turin and Alessandria-Novara are inaugurated; the
line for Novara sees many controversies for the tracing, considering also that
we are in the full load of the Renaissance and the wars of Independence, a long
time therefore for the final decisions is explained. The prosecution from Novara
to Lago Maggiore sees as many controversies. A connection with Momo and another
for Arona and, along the lago of Orta, for Pallanza are in planning. These
connections are asked from the local entrepreneurs, but the costs seem excessive
and direct line via Oleggio is opted instead of the one of Arona. Also this
draft sees light in 1855. The lago therefore is reached, and is possible to
shift goods with the boats and the barges. With the advent of the Reign of
Italy, the Piemonte is equipped with an organized net of lines, the densest of
the country, and in the single province of Novara (than then grouped also
Vercelli, Biella and the Ossola) is in function a seventh of all national net,
is worth to say beyond 260 km. The tracing of the line of the Valsesia knows the
longest times of performance, the plan begins in 1856 and the inauguration of
the line is only of 1886. In any case, the building of Varallo is disposed
beside of the railroads in sight of a prosecution of the line. The prealpine
railroad attracted attentions of the manufacturers of the zone, by now convinced
from the necessity and the interest, with the perspective of advantages could
arrive from the extention of the line towards other goals. In the meantime in
1880 had been finished the tramway from Vercelli to Aranco, near Serravalle, in
substitution of the original railway plan.

The Vercelli-Aranco makes part of the vercellesi tramway lines, constituting a
net of smaller communication, economic and efficient. Passing in review several
plans, we technically notice in particular the prealpine one, very hard to
exercise. It would demand multiple tunnels, mainteining an hard profile over
several mountains. From the Valsesia to the Sempione are planned many
alternative lines, of which we mention the two more realistic and interesting
solutions, the Roccapietra-Omegna line and the "Biglia plan", previewed with
narrow gauge rails. In both cases is evident also the local attempt to connect
the Valsesia to the river basin of the Cusio, without thinking about longer and
more profitable routes. Alternatively to the prealpine line was written a second
plan that previews a cut of 6 km under the Serra d'Ivrea. The line then follows
the course of the land passing for Cossato (this railway effectively will be
constructed from the FEB with 950mm gauge), catches up Crevacuore, then
intercrosses our line arriving to Gozzano where finally links on the line to the
lake. Also the Varallo-Alagna line deserves attention. The plan previewed the
electric traction. It arrived nearly to begin works resolving the problems
connected to the feeding of electric power, preparing also the area of the
terminus station, that would be risen in front to that one of the
Varallo-Novara.
Of all these projects became built:
-a railway in Vallesessera;
-the short railway Gozzano-Alzo;
-the Biella-Masserano FEB line.
Nobody of these lines today is still existing and therefore a direct railway
connection between Biella and the Valsesia is not existing, neither between
Turin and Sempione. As far as the Grignasco-Coggiola, or railroad of
Vallesessera, it was constructed along a path that constituted a part of the
plans described previously. A such line, never extended, neither completed will
reveal itself as a useless branch very soon. Also in this case we assist to
Biblical times for the realization: devised in 1883, the line saw the light only
in 1908. We are speaking about a total development of 14,503 km, with maximum
gradient of the 17 for thousands and a light trackage of 27.6 kg/m. The
Gozzano-Alzo and its nearly 8 km was a useless branch as soon as was
inaugurated. The use of the line was confined to the transport of the granito
and any kind of regular passenger service was previewed. As far as
Biella-Masserano, making part of FEB narrow gauge network, is interesting to
find the public competition to its realization, with a true popular money
collecting carried out in 1929; its realization was in forecast of a connection
towards Gattinara where it would be linked to the tramvia from Vercelli. With
the progressive cessation of all FEB lines, also this, rather than developing
itself ulteriorly and having an outlet that still today could be employed, was
extinguished.
Perspectives
I write these final considerations convinced that nothing will be never built.
Of the prealpine line, a lot wished in the 1800's, no one speak about it no
more. Novara depends more on Milan that on Turin, inspite of new TAV line, the
international traffics takes other directions, as one can think looking at the
important railway and street connections with France. The street traffic reaches
indefensible levels in Valsesia. The line for Varallo is in damage of closure,
many runs already today is made by substitutive buses. And then, it would be
still now reconsidering at least two connections: a direct one between Ivrea,
Biella and the Valsesia and the prosecution of the railroad from Varallo at
least until Alagna, if not for Gressoney or Cervinia; let's think to the utility
for the skiers in the winter season, with timetables thinked to this meaning. I
point out that similar lines work perfectly in Switzerland from at least a
hundred years (!): because there yes and here not?